perm filename MSG.MSG[COM,LSP] blob
sn#881548 filedate 1990-01-26 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002
C00003 ENDMK
Cā;
ā21-Jan-90 2301 Mailer failed mail returned
To: CL-Iteration-mailer@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
The following message was undeliverable to recipient(s):
Common-Lisp@BCO-MULTICS.ARPA
------- Begin undelivered message: -------
21-Jan-90 2301 CL-Iteration-mailer FOR x ACROSS v
Received: from ALDERAAN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM ([128.81.41.109]) by SAIL.Stanford.EDU with TCP; 21 Jan 90 23:01:52 PST
Received: from GANG-GANG.SCRC.Symbolics.COM by ALDERAAN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM via CHAOS with CHAOS-MAIL id 368402; 22 Jan 90 01:26:31 EST
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 90 01:26 EST
From: Glenn S. Burke <gsb@ALDERAAN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: FOR x ACROSS v
To: cl-iteration@sail.stanford.edu
Message-ID: <19900122062623.1.GSB@GANG-GANG.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Is this supposed to heed the fill pointer if a vector has one?
Opinions? Current practice?
It would seem to be the more useful choice. Symbolics' ANSI loop does
so.
------- End undelivered message -------
ā26-Jan-90 1953 Mailer failed mail returned
To: CL-Iteration-mailer@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
The following message was undeliverable to recipient(s):
Common-Lisp@BCO-MULTICS.ARPA
------- Begin undelivered message: -------
26-Jan-90 1953 CL-Iteration-mailer FOR x ACROSS v
Received: from lucid.com by SAIL.Stanford.EDU with TCP; 26 Jan 90 19:53:24 PST
Received: from kent-state ([192.31.212.24]) by heavens-gate.lucid.com id AA03338g; Fri, 26 Jan 90 19:54:02 PST
Received: by kent-state id AA05312g; Fri, 26 Jan 90 19:48:50 PST
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 90 19:48:50 PST
From: Jon L White <jonl@lucid.com>
Message-Id: <9001270348.AA05312@kent-state>
To: gsb@ALDERAAN.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
Cc: cl-iteration@sail.stanford.edu
In-Reply-To: Glenn S. Burke's message of Mon, 22 Jan 90 01:26 EST <19900122062623.1.GSB@GANG-GANG.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
Subject: FOR x ACROSS v
re: [ACROSS] Is this supposed to heed the fill pointer if a vector has one?
Sounds right to me. LENGTH certainly "heeds" the fill pointer.
-- JonL --
------- End undelivered message -------